‘Free’ Government Money is the Opposite of Compassion

By Jerry Newcombe Published on May 20, 2021

In his book Was Jesus a Socialist? author Lawrence W. Reed writes, β€œAlmost everybody wants to help those in need. The crucial question is how to help. Let’s not make the mistake of arguing that to use force, plunder, and dependency is somehow β€˜the Christian thing to do.’” [Emphasis his]

Today we see the party in power in Washington, D.C. spending recklessly, ostensibly to help those in need. But one suspects they’re really just trying to buy votes by giving away β€œfree” money. They are racking up debts so high they threaten our nation’s future. As Senator Rand Paul, Republican from Kentucky, asks, Where is the β€œmoney tree” to pay for all these supposedly good programs?

We see this on the state level too. The Associated Press reports (5/14/21) on a new plan by California Governor Gavin Newsom to presumably help those in need.

They write, β€œNewsom’s budget proposal, announced Friday, includes $35 million over five years to pay for β€˜universal basic income pilot programs.’ The idea is to give poor people money each month to help ease the stresses of poverty that can make it harder to find full-time jobs and stay healthy.”

Right now many small businesses are clamoring for more employees… But so many potential workers find it easier to just stay home and receive unemployment payments.

All of this sounds compassionate. But his critics, like the National Review (5/14/21), note that this is just a ploy to try and bribe his way to remain in office and to cover-up his β€œepic mismanagement.” Newsom, of course, is in the throes of a massive recall effort.

“The Christian Thing to Do”

Whether on the federal or the state level, is this β€œthe Christian thing to do”? To force Citizen A to work harder, so Citizen B can receive β€œfree” money? Government has no money of its own. So someone has to earn it β€” and often it is those in the middle class.

Said George Bernard Shaw, β€œIf you rob Peter to pay Paul, you’ll always have Paul’s vote.” This also creates long-term dependency.

Author Bob Lupton noted in his book, Toxic Charity:

            *Give once and you elicit appreciation;

            *Give twice and you create anticipation;

            *Give three times and you create expectation;

            *Give four times and it becomes entitlement;

            *Give five times and you establish dependency.

Presbyterian pastor Dr. D. James Kennedy noted that the New Testament teaching on work may sound harsh in today’s milieu. The Bible says that if a man will not work, then neither shall he eat. (It does not say, if he cannot work).

Kennedy says that this is actually a statement of great compassion. Dependence is crushing to the soul and deleterious to well-being, and Paul’s teaching points us toward fulfilling our God-given destiny through work.

Fostering Dependence

I just read an interesting story about the great American novelist, Sherwood Anderson (1876-1941). At first he earned little money in his writing career. His publisher sought to encourage him by sending him a weekly stipend (even without him writing anything), just to cover expenses, and at first Anderson received it.

But, notes the Boston Globe, β€œAnderson stood it for three weeks and then brought the newest check, unopened, back to the publisher’s office, β€˜It’s no use,’ he said, β€˜I find it impossible to write with security staring me in the face.’”

During the pandemic, we have seen massive bailouts to deal with the economic blow the virus has wrought. The problem is when people become repeatedly reliant on these things.

Right now many small businesses are clamoring for more employees. It is a crisis, and businesses like restaurants are closing around the country for lack of enough workers. But so many potential workers find it easier to just stay home and receive unemployment payments.

Personal Responsibility

This is very short-sighted on their parts. I remember seeing a study a few decades ago which compared two men, both around 20 years old. One was on welfare, just eking out an existence. The other had a minimum wage job. They both received about the same amount of money. The one working might well have thought, β€œWhy should I have to work so hard and receive so little β€” especially when my neighbor doesn’t work and β€˜earns’ the same?”

Please Support The Stream: Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political, Economic, and Moral Issues of Our Day.

Five years later, the working man had advanced well beyond minimum wage, while the welfare recipient was still eking out an existence. Ten years later, things were even more disparate. And so it goes. Fostering dependence and paying people not to work has consequences.

There is absolutely a place for Christian charity, and it is needed now more than ever. But that’s voluntary β€” not coercive, which all government redistribution schemes are.

Plus, in the long run, we help people much more by helping them learn personal responsibility. As the Salvation Army puts it, a β€œhand up” is far better than a β€œhand out.” Oh, that we could all see through these politicians who are in effect trying to buy votes β€” with other people’s money.

 

Jerry Newcombe, D.Min., is the executive director of the Providence Forum, an outreach of D. James Kennedy Ministries, where Jerry also serves as senior producer and an on-air host. He has written or co-written 33 books, including George Washington’s Sacred Fire (with Providence Forum founder Peter Lillback, Ph.D.) and What If Jesus Had Never Been Born? (with D. James Kennedy, Ph.D.) Learn more at www.jerrynewcombe.com and follow him on Twitter @newcombejerry.

 

 

Like the article? Share it with your friends! And use our social media pages to join or start the conversation! Find us on Facebook, X, Instagram, MeWe and Gab.

Inspiration
The Good Life
Katherine Wolf
More from The Stream
Connect with Us